![]() If you invert that circle through the circular mirror, it becomes the flat plane mirror we used in the reflection approximation. In hindsight, that special circle with half the radius now makes some sense. We can directly get to O''' from O by a single inversion through the circle that you describe above that has half the radius of the circular mirror! We're still in the inverted world, so we now need to invert back to the real world. Also notice that this inversion brings far away points close to the mirror, which is what is needed for the flat mirror approximation to be accurate. This is why the final point we come up with in the end will only be an approximation. Create a flat mirror and reflect the inverted point O' to O''. Now we can use the same reflection approximation on the inverted point. Since we used the mirror as the circe of inversion, the mirror looks the same after inversion. Invert the point O through the circular mirror to point O'. So we are going to invert, reflect, invert. Notice that inverting a point twice gets back to where you started, so to undo an inversion just apply the inversion again. The plan here is to invert point O through the circular mirror, then reflect the inverted point, then undo the inversion. Now lets use the circular mirror as a circle of inversion. This approximation only works well when the point O is close to the mirror (or looked at another way, the circular mirror is very large). ![]() One way to get an approximate reflection O' is to create a flat planar mirror (represented by the line) that is perpendicular to the line OC and tangent to the circular mirror. The below discusses the 2D case but equally applies to 3d. The first thing to note is that the formula given above for spherical mirrors is only a paraxial approximation, so one part of the mystery to unravel is where the approximation comes from. Is it merely a coincidence that reflection in spherical mirrors can be described by circular inversion about an imaginary circle about the focus, or is there a deeper reason behind this? The object distance ( $u$), image distance ( $v$) and the focal length of a spherical mirror ( $f$) are related by the well-known formula (using the appropriate sign convention):
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |